. . . than contemporary Omega movements; so small that spacer rings were necessary with case sizes that previously didn't require them. They were fitted to Constellations starting in the late '60s; many didn't have seconds hands, which is odd for a chronometer

.
There are collectible Omegas apart from the -masters, Constellations, Genèves, et al., but DeVilles, being pure dress watches, don't seem to have much traction with collectors. When alloyed with another line, like the Seamaster DeVilles of the '60s . . .
[photo credit: Dr No / watch credit: client at Omega boutique,
ca '11]
. . . as in this
ca '64 example, they offer a less costly route to Omega ownership than more sought after models, even though they share the same mechanical underpinnings.
For the money you're laying out, you're doing fine. Starting out at the lowest rungs of the ladder is a smart way to start collecting.
Cordially,
Art
This message has been edited by Dr No on 2016-07-20 11:42:59