Omega

. . . and a three-handed Patek, which cost roughly the same in the post-War era, has diverged to the point where the price ratio is at least 1 : 3 now.  Omega's book of business has always been oriented towards volume, Patek's towards exclusivity.  My sense is that what seems like a conundrum in the present is more a case of long-term trends getting played out over time.  

[1946 Omega ad in a US publication]

perhaps the most reliable and accurate movements on the planet currently. They also provide as good or better service than any watch company in the world with Omegas production level. The market defines relative value (no different from the stock market) and the market is always right. All my watches are Omegas. I have owned other “haute” pieces that have let me down (disasters) mechanically which is why I went all Omega. I actually rely on them when I’m on my boat or jet skis. There are a few pieces (I don’t own watches to impress others…only to please myself) that I’ve had my eye on (LF & Parmigiani) but this is purely for style and like I said personal satisfaction.