i had one several years ago and let it go because it was quartz, but now that i look back on many of Omega's quartz pieces their movements were way ahead of others. the hour set was and still is a brilliant system for world travellers.
luckily my collecting criteria is now so narrow that i'll just have to like these pieces vicariously.
several years ago i bought virtually any used watch i liked the look of and ended up with far too many to cope with. it does mean that my ownership experience is extensive, but the result just leads to fiscal destitution
enjoy it and wear it in good health.
G
...the battery on one of these only a few weeks ago. My GF brought it home from the wrist of one of her colleagues. Battered and on a leather band, but strangely alluring in it's wackiness. She wants one.
(Re: the 13xx Omega Quartz movements, weren't they a development of the Beta 21?)
This message has been edited by BDLJ on 2012-01-18 14:43:37I suppose it could be argued that all quartz watches are descendants of the Beta 21 movement,the cal 1310 probably being a 'grandchild'.
There's a really good thread on TZ-UK regarding early quartz development by Omega and others that might prove interesting. Not sure whether the forum rules allow me to post links to other fora but I'll give it a go anyway.
Cheers
Ian