Trying to get to grips with the forum and threads at the moment and have posted on another excellent thread.
I'm looking for help to identify a watch I have recently acquired from my father who died last year. Here are a couple of photos (apologies for the poor camera skills).
Thanks.



That's fantastic information. It's worth keeping then
I did notice there are a few very, very feint letters and numbers hand written with a scribe on the inside of the case. Would these be significant?
I understand it's a bit of a taboo on here to talk about value/money but ..... do you think I need to declare it as a separate item on the insurance?
I doubt it's been touched in many years so could probably do with a service, although it keeps very good time. Better infact than my Seamaster Pro that has a tendency to stop for no aparent reason! The strap is a few years old and not an Omega. Should this be replaced with an original perhaps?
Many thanks for your help Andrew.
Martin.
Hi,
as Andrew told you already a lot about case and date I will only add information about the movement.
It is a cal. 26,5 and will fit into the time range Andrew has provided.
This movement was widely used in many different case References and was very reliable.
regards
erich
Thanks Graham,
I was thinking of selling it as there's not really any emotional attachment to it. Now that I know a bit more about it (thanks to you lot), I'll probably hang on to it as a bit of a "watch fancier".
Not having any watches of particular significance (if value is your guide), this sits somewhat aloof in a box with a couple of modern Tags, a few Seiko's of varying description, a Swatch or two, a couple of old something or others yet to be explored, two or three modern quartz watches and my favourite but unreliable, Seamaster Professional with the new style automatic movement.
Martin.
It would make a superb dress watch for those special occasions.
It sounds like your seamaster needs a service just as much as the dennison cased model does.
It has family history which is a perfect reason to keep it. You would be better to offload the tags which are undoubtedly quartz to pay for the servicing.
G
Just for info:
This 26.5 movement (with Geneva stripes, not gilded) has only a slightly higher serial number and has 1933 as year of manufacture.
cheerio, Ben.

You are absolutely right Paul, thanks.
Of primary interest of course is the "birth" of a particular watch. For this 26.5SOB specimen the exact date (1933) was first verified in the archive documentation at MuseƩ Omega.
Then the watch was cosmetically prepared at the museum in order to be photographed at a studio in Bienne. A picture was published in both "Saga" and "Journey through time" by author Marco Richon.
best, Ben.
