
It was easy to fit my Japanese made steel deployment bracelet, bought in 1960's and which I still have (I am a hoarder even though that bracelet is crude and will never be used by me). The ends are open and were placed around the fixed bars and the ends carefully closed with slim pliers. Unsophisticated and naïve but it did the job. The ends had to be forced open when the bracelet was removed from the watch and became a bit battered when refitted on another. Worth nothing now I ought to scrap that bracelet instead of leaving it for my son to do the same!
The Bonklip steel bracelets were also open ended and closed by forcefully bending around the fixed bars. The RAF stores fitted the Bonklips when the watches were issued. Of course! I still also have my discarded original Bonklip, but that bracelet is far too long to be of much use today as I do not wear a watch over the top of thick flying jacket sleeves and gloves.
The Bonklip can be shortened by overlapping the patented segments when clipping it closed, but that makes it bulky to wear for a slim wrist. The design was interesting but now a bit too narrow for my liking. My Bonklip's ends show signs of wear following the forceful opening and removal from the watch's fixed bars. Maybe I should sell on Collectors Market or donate to a museum. It would be authentic for a collector of 1950's RAF Omega pilot watches, I suppose, but I doubt if anyone should want to wear one when instead a good, fitted alligator strap looks superb. To me, so-called NATO straps look crude, uncomfortable and not authentic to the period. The original canvas straps looked cheap and awful.


Very discrete with a lot of "content", sure you will love it.
Enjoy
François