Comments:
The case is the famous Radiomir 1940, but in a 42 mm diameter, and in steel.
Pre-SIHH 2016: Panerai PAM 655 - 42mm Radiomir 1940 w/ P.4000 movement
The case is the famous Radiomir 1940, but in a 42 mm diameter, and in steel.
The dial is white, with faux patina indexes and hands, and a small seocnds dial at 9 o clock.
The movement is the P 4000, which I like a lot for its micro rotor.
For those who don't want or cannot wear a big 47 mm case...
Now, the automatic mention on the dial was really not necessary.
A glance at the case back would have been enough to reassure those who only want automatic watches.
What do you think?
Best,
Nicolas
I like it, the white dial is smooth and the micro rotor is very nice.
I'm with you they could have left the automatic off the dial .
Full press release of the Panerai PAM655 is in our News Central forum
I like this new Panerai PAM655 Radiomir 1940 but wish it weren't in the small 42mm case. Wish it were a 45mm 
In any case, for a white dialed watch, this Panerai looks really great IMO. The black hands with the faux patina matches very well with the white dial. And the micro rotor of the P.4000 will give us variety from the usual manual wind or central rotor movements that we all have.
Read details in our News Central forum here: www.watchprosite.com
Cheers,
Anthony
Bring back the onion crown to the Radiomir series, and that would be perfect! [nt]
No message body
I may be one of the few
That is very happy with the 42mm choice. Wears much nicer on my wrist. And the micro rotor is very nice - all in all I am sure the watch will be a success
Great case indeed.....
Love this design and the micro-rotor, however, I am a little disappointed with the mouvement
not really something to write home about but the size is becoming more human friendly
Thank you for the news.
Cheers my friend
Francois
Meh
Like the micro rotor and size though
This message has been edited by Arie on 2015-12-02 02:39:19
No
Am not falling in the PAM trap again. Happened twice already.
Both have been traded in for something else due to their uncomfortable behavior on my wrist. So if three times would become a charm it has to be smaller than 44 mm. But maybe that compromise would be too large? Purist-wise
This message has been edited by Arie on 2015-12-03 04:42:15
Both have been traded in for something else due to their uncomfortable behavior on my wrist. So if three times would become a charm it has to be smaller than 44 mm. But maybe that compromise would be too large? Purist-wise
This message has been edited by Arie on 2015-12-03 04:42:15
A lot of husbands are, litterally, in 7th heaven....
they will, finally, be able to buy..the wife...her own Panerai, and keep theirs out of reach. Other than that...oh yuck!!!
If I had the choice between a 47 mm and this 42 mm one, you already know where I will go. ;) [nt]
No message body
Sans dir, but the metamorphosis...
towards more "livable" watches, has to deviate from the 47mm. A 45MM...destro...with white dial, would also have been acceptable, for me This pale "dwarf", doesn't float my boat. Ciao bello
This pale "dwarf", doesn't float my boat. Ciao bello