WatchProSite|Market|Digest

IWC

 

One day in 45, 000, 000 years. That sounds quite optimistic for a human life. And will IWC be alive in 45, 000, 000 years to service it? :))))

 
 By: amanico : June 27th, 2024-20:59
login to reply

We all know it's mostly bragging rights here...😉

 
 By: India Whiskey Charlie : June 27th, 2024-21:02
login to reply

Another marketing creation. ;)

 
 By: amanico : June 27th, 2024-21:04
login to reply

👍🤣

 
 By: hora12reborn : June 29th, 2024-04:57
login to reply

yeah, they'll be around... because owners will have sent their Eternal Calendars back to IWC almost 5 million times for service by then, so they'll be doing just fine +++

 
 By: j.jota : June 27th, 2024-21:04
;-)
login to reply

Ha... I didn't see things like that. You have a point! ;)

 
 By: amanico : June 27th, 2024-21:05
login to reply

😆😆😆

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 28th, 2024-14:42
login to reply

+1 Wow a nine year servicing interval another achievement🤣

 
 By: hora12reborn : June 29th, 2024-04:58
I wonder what wear and tear will look like 😁
login to reply

On a serious note, I didn't service my Patek 5110P since I bought it, in 2004, and it runs perfectly. :)

 
 By: amanico : June 29th, 2024-06:59
login to reply

So you are among those that go with the slogan do not fix

 
 By: hora12reborn : June 29th, 2024-12:42
or servie a watch that is not broken. Same for me.
login to reply

Yes, clearly.

 
 By: amanico : June 29th, 2024-15:37
login to reply

Yes, I am too...😂

 
 By: India Whiskey Charlie : June 29th, 2024-16:50
login to reply

Hahahaha!!! ;)

 
 By: amanico : June 29th, 2024-18:17
login to reply

The brands want us to spend lots of money on servicing at very close intervals and tell us to do so and not to wait till the timing gets erratic🤔

 
 By: hora12reborn : June 29th, 2024-21:04
login to reply

Yep, but... We resist. ;)

 
 By: amanico : June 29th, 2024-21:33
login to reply

😂 yes

 
 By: hora12reborn : June 30th, 2024-16:40
login to reply

We'd better!

 
 By: amanico : June 30th, 2024-18:59
login to reply

OK, technically superior movement, but the moon display has no charm!

 
 By: cazalea : June 28th, 2024-00:40
It's an engineer's moon, not that wondrous object in the sky.



Here's NASA's view of the moon





login to reply

Do you think the rest of the watch has any charm? I find it cold, very cold, to say the least...

 
 By: India Whiskey Charlie : June 28th, 2024-01:05


Photos: Mark Kauzlarich



login to reply

No charm whatsoever, cold as ice and whatever that hole is at 4:30 is very distracting

 
 By: cazalea : June 28th, 2024-03:11
login to reply

As much as I like IWC - and particularly their people - I tend to agree.

 
 By: Timeout : June 28th, 2024-09:16
I saw this at Watches and Wonders - where they had the best exhibition by far - and tried it on along with their other perpetuals. I was left wondering why they didn’t match it with their obsidian dial (which stole most of the attention from everyone I saw there) which has a beautiful dial, great presence and would have made the cutout a more subtle feature.

At 44.4mm diameter it’s too much for my 17.2cm wrist but I was way more tempted than I’d ever thought I’d be 😉

login to reply

Agree, this one is almost perfect

 
 By: jack johnson : June 28th, 2024-20:40
I got one recently - no regrets smile



login to reply

That one is pretty.

 
 By: hora12reborn : June 29th, 2024-04:59
login to reply

Thank you for appreciating, sir!

 
 By: jack johnson : June 29th, 2024-08:17
login to reply

Well, I think this is the kind of watches to be seen in person before any final judgement.

 
 By: amanico : June 28th, 2024-16:04
login to reply

🥶🥶🥶🥶

 
 By: hora12reborn : June 29th, 2024-04:59
login to reply