Patek Philippe

I understand that some Patek Philippe models, such as the Nautilus and Aquanaut, are in high demand and that there is a supply-and-demand situation to consider. However, I'm not sure how much it would help the client who has lost trust in the brand. Altho

I think it makes sense. There’s a finite amount of pieces and do you allocate to someone who has purchases several watches or no watches. I don’t feel someone has a “right” to buy an aquanaut or nautilus or whatever — so long as there’s not some unlawful

Because it seems there is sanctioned “blackmail” if it’s Patek’s own products of buying a Calatrava, complications, etc. to get an aquanaut or nautilus. I also don’t think there’s anything wrong with that too—it’s just the word they use. And I can see why

I am since 6 years on the waiting list for an Aquanaut. When I ordered it, I was asked, if I know the value of the watch on the second hand market, I was really wondering that they put my name on the list. Three years later I was asked to buy some three h

I think a lot of the discussion has been based on misunderstandings of what has changed. Reading the press release, the change is now there is a clear definition of what 30m water resistance means (e.g. you can swim at a depth of 30m) and they are testing

At least in my mind, Patek has a history of shunning the norm and taking their own direction (like when they left the Geneve seal standard to create their own PP seal, which is completely without outside accountability, when you think about it, but nobody

Today I picked up my Aquanaut Blue for just walking in the sunshine. The sunburst dial really becomes vibrant and can enjoy the beauty of the nature and the watch. With warmest wishes

This morning when I looked, unlike yesterday, the 120 m in the description now is gone and replaced. So there’s no inconsistency anymore. For 5168G description: Paying tribute to the 20th anniversary of the Aquanaut launched in 1997, the men’s model is no