5327

Enter text

Beautiful weather here... Wishing all a great start to the week.

It’s by far too easy to call it a contest… 😉 2 simple questions: - to which watch do these moonphase belong? - which one do you prefer? (not which watch ref but which moon phase as it is the theme of the day…)

Breguet Perpetual Calendar #5327 Breguet Réveil du Tsar grand feu boutique edition Of course, these two aren't too shabby either: Glashütte Original PanoRetroGraph Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Automatic Cheers, all!

While it’s beautiful and I love the pump pushers, I find it too thick. I’ve been obsessed with the 3940 for a while. I’ve tried it on many times. While I love the design, I just can’t pull the trigger due to the 36mm size. I’ve tried 5140 and 5327 - while

But in my eyes the 5327 is oversized and a bit out of proportion. Only 3940, 5040 and 5940 have a date ring with similar sized numerals. But only the date numerals of the 5940 have this beautiful romantic typeface. In combination with the breguet hour num

whereas the 5327 has only no 6: the case being larger, the dial can and does include a 3 and a 9. As for the 5740, I suspect that its dial aperture is quite smaller, the bezel being large, than the one of the 5327, which has a thin bezel. So, for me, when

https://collectability.com/learn/collectability-in-depth-patek-philippe-perpetual-calendar-ref-3940/ The Roman numerals reference is similar to 5327 despite the fact that it’s 36mm. 5740 has the 240 movement and is proportional despite its larger size. So

The 5327 is a wonderful watch. I'm a fan of the classic PCs from PP. But imho this modern Interpretation is a bit oversized. I write this by being aware that also size is a matter of taste. As the 3940 was always a bit too small for my wrist I found my so