Had my 5712A with me and tried the Cubitus and well, it didn't impress upon me - somehow it didn't 'smile' back like the others when i tried them on at my AD. Was very candid with my AD i will pass and focus on the others which i had earlier indicated my
Without rehashing all the negatives posted about this watch/ the comments by TS/ the marketing/ the movement/ etc., etc., it's just plain too big & wears too thick- especially on my 16.5 cm (6 1/2 inch) wrist. It is not the new stylish, classy, elegant 57
The original Nautilus wears nicely too (But the Aquanaut with its downward-sloping lugs, as I said in my original post, is the champ of the PP sport watches for wrist-hugging) Best E.
When the one and only GLau said “hey wanna try the Cubitus?”, well, I couldn’t not!…so found myself with him the next day in a local PP boutique with the two-tone version (plastic-wrapped, of course) on my wrist. The boutique also had a 5167 on bracelet,
who express their distaste of the design will slowly warm up to it and buy it, and it will have its own following. There are so many men who still favor big watches like ROO, even though there is some tendency towards smaller watches, after seeing all the
I have to say it’s way nicer than I expected. The case is beautifully finished. The dial layout is very nice and what you’d expect. The big date is just big enough but not too big. I even didn’t mind the round movement in the square case (I love the 240 m
Nautilus² .... as in the next series, and also works as 'squared', plus it's a mathematical fun notation. For marketing, the raised 2 really is an interesting visual and graphical space 'standout' of sorts. While small in size, it also makes a big differe
But I can appreciate your overall point. But why do you say it will only go to VVIPs…did the AD say something about needing previous purchase history as opposed to new clients? If this is indeed the new “Nautilus” sports line, then I will expect it to be