obstacle Lolll I'm sure there are many "human" models The Panerai Due line focusses on 42-40 and even some 38mm models, which are quite quaint and attractive. As a purist, I would rather they kept some models in their original, "bold" size. Like the 372,
just maybe, they should have found and M.D. that actually liked Panerai, in the first place. Instead, they got swanky boys chasing after Happy Hours and Sailors My opinion of course.My 673- 0001/1000 will stay with me in perpetuity
My wrist is only 6.8" so these watches (673, 587, 249) look almost cartoonishly large, unless I'm in my submersible barreling underwater toward an enemy ship. But, oddly enough, they're comfortable ... and so beautiful that I don't have the heart to sell
Aesthetically, I have a slight preference for the 587, so that's my vote. It's my favorite modern Panerai. But I will always remember Sergio comparing the two cases and noting a slight comfort advantage for the 673. So this brings the two quite close in m
But I also liked so much the 673 looks with the new P3000 movement and its classic crown bridge. So… you know Dexter: this kind of dilemma has only one answer: get both! lol! (PS: you know I love the MM inscription on a Panerai dial!!) Abrazos amigo mío!!
to even consider a "suggestion". You've got too much stuff in your head. In Italian we would say, too many ideas and all of them confused...lollllllllllllllllllllllll I wrote, way back, that IMO, the 587 has a hefty case and sits pretty high (and uncomfor
372, 423, 587 vs 673, 662 vs. 663? The 47mm Panerai’s fit comfortably on my wrist. I’d like to acquire another 47mm Panerai. I read on another thread that the 47mm Radiomir, perhaps the 587 in particular, sits uncomfortably high on the wrist and that the