WatchProSite|Market|Digest

5504

Featuresexpand_more
Spotlightexpand_more
Featured Forumsexpand_more
Brand Forumsexpand_more
Independent Brandsexpand_more
Lifestyleexpand_more
Resourcesexpand_more

People say that there aren't too many Explorer references

What they forget is that there are damn near infinite variations in all those references! I now have the 214270 "Mark II", 114270, and a "frog-foot" matte dial 1016. That only leaves...let's see... 6098 6298 non-3-6-9 white dial 6298 non-3-6-9 black dial
6Y
By: reintitan
21
amanico
5752

Remembering some Canadian Rolexes

Just managed to dig out some of my older Canadian Rolexes. I have an identical twins. Both of them have the same date of birth i.e. II. 1958 and 5504. Too bad the honeycomb white one is a refinished dial. Both movement is a non chronometer cal. 1530. The
11Y
By: WatchCrazy
8
WatchCrazy
4268

Twins!

What an amazing coincidence, my friend. The look exactly the same! I did not know you owned one! I have made a long research about this reference dials variations, and stick markers in both of our watches are the same when usually the more commons have th
11Y
By: FrancisV
26
FrancisV
10646

New income,ready to start the week

After a long search, I recently acquired this beauty, ref 5504. It was one of the watches on my list and certainly not easy to find in all original and good condition. As you all know this reference has a special feature as it came with this Air King SP d
11Y
By: FrancisV
26
FrancisV
10646

Rolex – The comprehensive Guide to Vintage Rolex, defining what is Vintage Rolex.

We all know vintage simply means old but what defines true Rolex vintage in a comprehensive and universal way. This report will attempt to give you a thorough explanation of how to recognize Vintage Rolex. Rolex Submariner Gilt circa 1963 - 1966 What are
1Y
By: Bill
54
Drek
40411

Is it a reference 5504 ?

it looks very clean, congrats ! I have an Explorer 1 with the unusual reference 1018; it also has a gilt dial, but a cal.1560 chronometer
15Y
By: EdwardL
20
Edward Lee
7977

OK I see...

not a ref 1016 but a non chronometer version, probably ref. 5504. The watch looks very nice ! Cheers Jeff
16Y
By: Baron - Mr Red
5
brokenwrist
1332

Sports

Regret selling the Rolex 1016 & 5504 to my friends..
5M
By: maxbliss888
609
maxbliss888
570476

That is strange

18Y
By: DrStrong
32
walterc19
12687