126500

I had the last 4 white Daytonas. The 116500 is perhaps ultimately very endearing with its small "defects", the sub-meters too big and the case more clumsy. The 126500 is just perfect, the edge of the steel bezel, the case with lugs that eats the wrist bet

These are very similar. But I personally prefer 11 bc it looks like it shows more pop. But honestly both are amazing.

When something new comes onto the market, many people naturally gravitate toward the newer model, while owners of the previous version tend to prefer their older product. But now, after several years, which one would you choose today if you could only hav

After 15 years of collecting Pateks, i am falling in love with the daytona… started with the platona few months back and got another impulsive buy yesterday… i am loving the black dial. Need to find a way to stop this obsession🙈

Pass on MOP dial or any Rolessor. My choice is 126500 panda, symmetrical lugs, thinner profile, modern movement, easylink, smaller surrounds, metal protection for the ceramic insert and the fact I've got it from the AD. Waited 3.000 days more or less (Jun

Been thinking about how differently collectors talk about the steel Daytona depending on which generation they came up in. The 116520 introduced the Calibre 4130 in 2000 - column-wheel, vertical clutch, entirely in-house. That was the real turning point.

Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN

Panda got some wrist time too.

For me it’s all about the aesthetic. The ROC dial, solid sub dials, slimmer hands and baton markers, and brushed bracelet is so much more refined than the latest iterations. The only problem is ensuring the provenance and the price! At EUR 120k asking thi