Hello Both brands are great and both watches too. I have no idea of their value evolution to come. I just find the 5016 to be very reasonable. As for my choice, I put a pink gold 5016 on my wrist something like 30 years ago and I still remember that time like yesterday.
I must say I really like this new JLC range. It’s hard to design a new original and fine integrated bracelet. I find this one very nice. I just regret the limited water resistance.
Gorgeous car, a bit looking like a Ferrari 166 or an Aston DB mkIII but so pleasing. I’ve long had a drophead version in my holiday’s neighborhood and always found it amazing. AC before Shelby was so subtile.
Pure simple design that ends up just perfect. And a fantastic calibre. I particularly love the longest blued hand I know. Great people involved too, like often at JLC. And a watch that brings us to the best of time of my passion for horology. That was something. Cheers.
These different versions with or without perpetual calendar, with or without dial are the most appealing 200 watches I know. The current minute repeater sounds very well too, but the watch is not as appealing.
📅 Posted: April 12, 2007 ✍️ By: Dje 🔍 Summary: An extensive breakdown of the innovation behind JLC's lubrication-free Cal. 988C movement, high-tech materials like Easium™ carbonitride, and design features including the use of iridium platinum for the balance, magnesium alloy tourbillon cage, and a m
Hi Nico Even without enamel. I remember the launch of this watch like if it was yesterday. The most complicated simple watch possibly. And one of the more appealing. As I’m more and more shortsighted I appreciate even more simple to read watches. I’d still prefer a PP 3939 though, but not just for i