WatchProSite|Market|Digest

My Posts

Featuresexpand_more
Spotlightexpand_more
Featured Forumsexpand_more
Brand Forumsexpand_more
Independent Brandsexpand_more
Lifestyleexpand_more
Resourcesexpand_more

Omega: Is this font right

I was looking at some old Seamaster 30 watches and I came across this piece and the font on "Seamaster" looks off. Am I wrong or is right?
9Y
By: Rawalmond73
2

Omega: How big is that watch?

I\'m not sure I could wear that.
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
1

Omega: Thank you

Art your a wealth of knowledge. I appreciate you taking the time to share what you know.
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
0

Omega: Movements?

So why are some movements more coveted than another? Is the Cosmic 2000 liked less because it\'s hard to access the movement?
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
1

Omega: What year model is this?

That\'s a beautiful watch? I read the new 300\'s were based off the original Seamaster, made in 1954 I think. That would be a wonderful addition to the collection, but tough to find I imagine.
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
1

Omega: Thanks

I\'m amazed I stumbled on to the 1973 model. Now I just need the 1973, Speedmaster, speedmaster 125 anniversary and a 1973 speedmaster TV.
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
0

Omega: Very nice [nt]

10Y
By: Rawalmond73
1

Omega: 1973 Omega Seamaster Cosmic 2000 diver VS 2015 Seamaster 300 CoAxil

I just got the 1973 Seamaster today so doing an in depth comparison would be a bit hard. The first thing I noticed is just the sizes of the watches. The '73 model is a 38mm and the '15 is 41mm. Both are Automatic movements but the exact movement of the '73 I'm unsure of at this moment. The '73 seems
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
3

Seiko: It's a new addition.

The watch is super clean, I was even surprised how good of shape it was in when I received it.
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
1

Seiko: 1973 Seiko 5 Stainless Steel Automatic 33mm day/date

Enter your post text
10Y
By: Rawalmond73
1