My Posts

5270 seems to have a smaller moonphase (in actual size, not only in proportion), as compared to 5970. It might be a compromise for lower position of the two subdials(seconds and chronograph minutes) of the new in-house chronograph movement (as the same lay-out in ref.5170), as well as for maintainin

I was making my own decision a couple of months ago with almost the same budget. Finally, I chose 5960R and 5712 1/A. Functionally, I got annual calendar, chronograph, moon phase, and power-reserve. On the other hand, this combo means TWO complicated Patek watch: one gorgeous formal gold watch with

The WG bezel with large letters is rather shiny and easily gets attention......and scratch. Maybe some of us love the design and dial, but finally give up purchasing this watch because of the bezel.

Owning several Pateks, I think the craftsmanship of the dial and case of this watch can be among the top rank. The design is superb. It shines the eyes and makes people fresh, but is not weird at all. Although a bit heavy, this watch is weared comfortable over the wrist.

This post has been moved to the relevant forum click here to read