Patek Philippe 5740/1G: Perpetual Calendar Guide
Reference Guide

Patek Philippe 5740/1G: Perpetual Calendar Guide

By 5980 · Oct 23, 2024 · 26 replies
5980
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
26 replies15908 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in πŸ’¬ βœ‰ πŸ”—

In a compelling analysis, forum member 5980 delves into the highly anticipated Patek Philippe Nautilus Perpetual Calendar, Reference 5740/1G. This article explores 5980's detailed rationale behind Patek Philippe's decision to craft this significant reference in white gold, positioning it as the 'Grand Dame' of the Nautilus line. His insights offer a valuable perspective on the watch's place within the brand's hierarchy and its appeal to collectors.

26 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
First, I'm a Nautilus guy. So pinch of salt required. Many of us have long speculated on the eventual introduction of a Nautilus PC. I suspect many of my fellow collectors will tip the hat at its arrival, and with this introduction opinions will differ across all aspects of the final design and implementation. Across the spectrum (e.g., three vs four subdials, dial tone, price, etc.) there certainly is sufficient material for interesting debate, but I'll focus my comments on what I suspect to be the most contentious decision: metal, specifically white gold.

I've been batting this question back and forth in my own mind for some time, trying to reach my personal conclusion on the matter by creating my dream virtual Nautilus PC. Platinum, white gold, rose gold, yellow gold (!), steel, "exotic" / Ti, etc. All but three I dismissed for obvious reasons. The remainder - platinum, white gold, steel - each has its merits and issues; as no more than food for thought I'll offer my take below.

For those who are already tired of my drivel, the short answer first: I think as designed, in white gold, the 5740/1G is the ideal PC Nautilus for PP.

****

I consider the 5740/1G to be the Grand Dame, top of the Nautilus pecking order but for the occasional limited editions (think the current 40th and future 50th). As such, IMO the choice to manufacture in white gold was a fait accompli: the limited run and 40th 5711/1P have the edge on her in metal (P vs G) and the 40th 5976/1G has the edge in pure, physical mass (more grams), while the 5740/1G has the edge on all other Nautili in movement (and, while not necessarily better or worse, it's dial tone appears akin to that of the anniversary pieces, a further distinction). White gold slots the 5740/1G perfectly in the Nautilus hierarchy

Further, and perhaps more relevant to a wearer of any of these, in my experience white gold provides a beautiful yet subtle classiness given its color tone, which is absent in steel. No question steel is the sportier choice, and no question the Nautilus's history is one of "sports" watch (loosely defined), but make no mistake PP has noticed how consumers increasingly are comfortable wearing their sporty option (whether PP or another maison) in less-sporty and even formal occasions. I know I do despite a few other historically more appropriate options. The 5740/1G is exactly as advertised: "elegance."

Finally, I believe white gold provides the necessary, but not excessive, heft to ensure a noticeable yet comfortable wear on the wrist, while its tone promotes just enough "look at me, I'm special" both for the wearer and her/his audience. Given the 5740/1G svelte dimensions relative to other Naughties in the lineup, white gold ensures this reference wears "bigger" than the well proportioned, but arguably understated 5712/1A. Similar dimensions, greater mass, greater awareness by owner and others. Conversely, the decision to manufacture in gold rather than platinum ensures the 5740/1G wears smaller than its big / senior brethren, the 5711/1P and 5976/1G, befitting and showcasing its stunning movement and case dimensions. While I'm prone to wearing my 5976/1G daily and find it perfectly comfortable, I appreciate it's size and weight may deter others. The 5740/1G goes some way in addressing this concern while hitting the objectives above. In fact, I expect it to wear more comfortably than the 5990/1A and perhaps even the 5980/1A, a result of it's meaningfully smaller case size and therefore very different distribution of weight (case to bracelet).

With all that, I'm very happy with this introduction from PP, a fine balance of various and perhaps occasionally competing objectives. Of course, this is just my two cents; I look forward to the discussion I hope this sparks.







About the Patek Philippe Nautilus Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5740

The Nautilus reference 5740/1G-001 represents a significant addition to the Nautilus collection, integrating a perpetual calendar complication into the distinctive case design. This reference marked the first time a perpetual calendar was housed within a Nautilus, elevating its technical sophistication while maintaining the established aesthetic of the line. It appeals to collectors seeking a combination of Patek Philippe's high complications and the sportier profile of the Nautilus.

This timepiece features an 18k white gold case measuring 40 mm in diameter and 8.42 mm in thickness. It is powered by the ultra-thin self-winding caliber 240 Q, which provides a power reserve of 48 hours. The movement is visible through a sapphire crystal case back, while the front is protected by a sapphire crystal. The watch is water resistant to 60 meters.

The blue sunburst dial with its horizontal embossed pattern is characteristic of the Nautilus family, here featuring three sub-dials for the perpetual calendar indications. The integrated bracelet is also crafted from 18k white gold. This reference stands as a notable example of Patek Philippe's ability to combine complex horology with a distinct design language, offering a refined option within its grand complication offerings.

Specifications

Caliber
240 Q
Case
18k White Gold
Diameter
40 mm
Dial
Blue
Water Resist.
60m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
DR
dr.kol
Mar 21, 2018
I love the dial - both colour and layout.

But no WG for me. With time the metal is turning towards dirty yellow and steel would have been much more scratch resistant. Titanium would have been a super solution. Best, Kari

RE
redcorals
Mar 21, 2018
A fine luking timepiece. wat do you think of the fact that dings on bezel- when polished- leaves imperfection on ..

...integrated case specially considering this is 100k+ watch? This Nautilus for me at least becomes a dress watch worn under cuff and not a sports watch worn without. YMMV. For eg. APRO replaceable bezel seems more amenable to use precious metal complications as daily wearers.

59
5980
Mar 21, 2018
No question if the usual dings and nicks from wear are bothersome, you won't avoid them here.

Having written that, I wear (and therefore have dinged) all of mine in all metals. Almost πŸ˜‰. It has never bothered me though I can appreciate why it could. I actually don't find gold any more susceptible than is steel. In fact, to the contrary, which I think in part is due to the additional care / attention I sub-consciously take, which itself I suspect is directly proportionate to the value of the watch 😌. Better said, I think I'm instinctually more cavalier with steel on my wrist. Arguably not

PR
Pretty Boy
Mar 21, 2018
Great write-up my friend.

However, I tend to concur with Kari's observations as regards the "metal" chosen. I do understand PP's approach and I expected it to be in G or P but Ti would have made this Nautilus QP even more special. Like you, I'm a huge Nautilus fan and I already thought about 5711R and 5980R with their beautiful brown dial. But I'm not sure what I should think about 5740G. I will see all 2018 novelties at a PP trunk show on 23 April 2018 and I cannot rule out that I will love 5740G but so far I'm a bit he

59
5980
Mar 21, 2018
I hear you. Ti could be the killer app, but between the challenge in working the metal to the tooling required to do so I suspect for PP Ti remains for the time being the provenance of the occasional Only Watch... [nt]

PR
Pretty Boy
Mar 21, 2018
AP have started to use Ti for RO and ROC (case and bracelet) ...

... a couple of years ago (and they have done on ROO before) so PP should be able to do this as well. Many brands nowadays use β€žmodernβ€œ materials like Ti and ceramic; in this area PP seems to lack behind. I absolutely appreciate that PP want to preserve their heritage, rare handcrafts and complicated movements but it would be nice to see a bit more avant-garde. The Aquanaut chrono is a good step into the right direction.

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →