Hi,
Can we have a considered discussion about "reliability?"
The subject comes up on a regular basis, both here about cars, and also about watches. Usually in shorthand. Most recently it came up in a sub-thread within the larger topic of exotic car ownership, with some salient comments made by g99 and Bimbeano and BDLJ.
First, can we have a definition of "reliability?"
To my mind, the word means something "works the way it was designed to work, consistently and dependably," within a generally accepted "useful life" which is measured in both continuous time and operating hours.
Already I can see some hand waving and divergence of operating definitions...
Some overarching general topics I hope we can address (even if only a cursory address) are -
"exotic cars" (not necessary "supercars") tend to be less reliable than less exotic cars
"Supercars" tend to be less reliable, in normal daily "street" use than non-supercars
ceteris paribus, of course.
I'd also hope we can touch on ideas like
small run productions usually get less development work done on them, and through their market lifecycles
exotic solutions tend to be less "tested" and debugged
inherent engineering reliability
reliability as a result (or victim) of production or execution of the raw engineering concept
more stressed designs (and executions) are less reliable than less stressed designs (and executions) ceteris paribus
Can development and refinement offset stress related reduced reliability? What about production tolerances? Operating tolerances? Materials and manufacturing processes?
eg, Maserati engines vs Ferrari engines on which they are based
the 456 V12 vs the 550 and 575 Maranello engines
The Metzer engine as it evolved and grew in displacement; the Bizzarrini Lambo engine, et al...
Curious what others have to say about these and other ideas related to "reliability."
Bimb? BDLJ? G99?