jaspermccrea
172
It's not massive
My Chrono One at 42 x 13 probably feels slightly more unwieldy than this. But 43mm is not for everyone, I suppose.
Chopard L.U.C Lunar One Rose Gold Blue dial.
A nice official photo of a gorgeous version. 25 pieces. What do you think of this one? Best, Nicolas ...
My thought exactly...
...as I value thinness. Love the hands and the Romans, but the other type seems out of scale somehow. Also not sure about the big date. Maybe better handled in one of the subdials...
Gorgeous timepiece but ...
I find the colorway of its platinum brother more consistent and attractive to my liking. Wish the indexes a tad slimmer and bigger movement size for the case ...
Dial is a little cluttered...
The bold Roman numerals are imposing IMO and have many cutoffs. But I like the big date and the MP subdial. Overall, it would be a fun weekend wear with the rose gold, blue dial and brown strap combination.
Those Roman numerals never speak to me for their complicated LUC pieces…
Plus most are 45mm big and thick. I wish they have a way to slim it down.
I like it but certainly not Chopard’s best offering.
Thick, large case. Cut-off numerals. Thin font on the big date. This needs a bit of rework for me.
It's not massive
My Chrono One at 42 x 13 probably feels slightly more unwieldy than this. But 43mm is not for everyone, I suppose.
It's a Chopard! It's a L.U.C. I like it!
It's beautiful to look at indeed, with all kinds of complications on the dial to admire. Lovely coloring too. Alas, I can only see the hour, minutes, and second hands on watch dials these days if I am lucky. Grande complications I still can admire on othe...
I quite like it; the simplified months display to
a single letter, although the Roman numerals are quite bold and cut off as said by others. The layout works as it is the similar to the Lange Perpetual.