I must confess I was not sure whether to include this post on the Patek forum or the independents but I would like to give both watches a fair chance so I opted for the independents. At the SIHH this year, I had the chance to meet the passionate Gronefeld brothers and will get another chance to meet Bart and Tim in Basel. They gave me their lovely book and this time I shall bring it with me to get their autograph. I was in awe of the Remontoire when I saw it. Some may say the movement is somewhat fussy but I love it and it looks even better than most manual chronographs. I liked the Remontoire enough to actually consider parting with my prized Aston Martin Vantage and I do love the Vantage but something would have to give (and I still love all parts of my anatomy!!)
Then a month ago I came across an advertisement on chrono 24 of an Italian dealer selling a Patek Philippe 130 from 1940. It has its original box, extract from the archives and the watch has been serviced at Patek. I have a notoriously small wrist so 33mm is not an issue. In fact 33m might be a better fit than a 39mm Remontoire but from the photos, you may think not.
So should I pull the trigger on one these (am I hearing some of you actually say 'keep the Aston!!'??!!
), which one should it be? yes, I know, there is no right answer here and they both make compelling purchases but I can only buy one. Okay, to make it interesting, allow me to add keeping the Aston as the third option!
Best wishes,
Sham



