COUNT DE MONET
10808
indices are not blending into the 1966 design, imho
I wonder if this one would have been better looking if GP kept the 1966 design?
Or: maybe GP had the feeling to add more decoration to it as the 1966 design is quite austere?
Best
Moritz
A quick wristshot of the GP 1966 Stainless Steel
It's funny but this watch is a kind of paradox: a good surprise for a watch without any surprise! Fx...
indices are not blending into the 1966 design, imho
I wonder if this one would have been better looking if GP kept the 1966 design? Or: maybe GP had the feeling to add more decoration to it as the 1966 design is quite austere? Best Moritz
Thanks Moritz for pointing out something important.
I think that the 1966 design would have been too austere so this more "decorated dial" is for me the good surprise! Fx
LOL! ...a good surprise for a watch without any surprise...
Very well put! Best Blomman
Versatility and style
Love this watch. It's very versatile thanks to the steel case and the slightly less formal styling of the dial. I'd use it practically every day!
Very versatile and I'd say fairly good value in steel
I may sound like Nico here but would probably have preferred it without the date - especially since it is so tiny.
For me a nicely balanced offer.. Pretty versatile yes- well not for swimming..LoL !.. :))
.. Despite Nico\'s known aversion, I don\'t really mind the date too much.. This noble appeal will go from dressy to casual, well - not as a tool-watch of course. Altogether I like this 1966, obviously a GP entry level product, which I am not that sure th...
Had an opportunity to try it on yesterday
And it is definitely a great piece. Works very well with more formal attire but will also dress down adequately well, and I am sure that someone looking for only one watch in their lives could do a lot worse than this. Also got lots of appreciation by the...