WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

Actually I did understand your point of view but disagree with you.

 

As I said in my reply to you  "I do understand you wanted to compare comparable watches in terms of functionality and quality but then again why compare the Tissot Seastar with a Seiko 5 when the Tissot is 2.5 times the price of the Seiko 5? its not a fair comparison"


So I do understand you are taking the cheapest Japanese Watch and Swiss watch and trying to answer whether the price premium for a Swiss watch is justified and whether just because the Seiko 5 is 2.5 times cheaper than the Tissot is it a cheap badly made watch or not. I understand but that argument is neither fair to the Seiko or Tissot. If you want to compare watches they should be on the basis of technical features and price point. If I had a USD 1000 to spend which watch is better. That is the question.

You have stated that a USD 1,000 Seiko has no chance in Europe because of perception issues because Seiko produces cheaper models. I disagree with this point. There are far deeper historic, social and politically incorrect reasons for the perception that Seiko is not as good as a Swiss made watch. I doubt if these barriers can ever be overcome but there is and always will be a small core of enthusiasts which understand and are hungry for USD 1,000 and above Seiko watches. I have seen them on other forums. A very vocal and passionate group. Regardless I doubt Seiko has a problem since it can sell its total production of above USD 1,000 watches very easily in Asia, many new models get sold out very quickly.

S

  login to reply