seabas132
1348
Agree. The thickness is really unnecessary and I wish the numerals
were slightly larger to better fit the indices proportionally.
Simple 3-handers
Earlier today I got an opportunity to check the 1948 seamaster and was positively surprised with the reasonable thickness compared to what online pictures suggested. Also for comparison a side by side picture of the GS sbgw033 a 130th anniversary limited ...
Agree. The thickness is really unnecessary and I wish the numerals
were slightly larger to better fit the indices proportionally.
Really nice pair.
They both look excellent! The sbgw033 was my inspiration for buying my SBGW253 purchase.
It’s a charming and very usable watch 😊👍🏻
The engraving disappears when you use the NATO that comes with the watch 😉 Here’s mine saying hi 👋🏻 ...
Thanks for sharing
The coaxial wording is barely noticeable thanks to the thin and small font.
Indeed - that was nicely done 👍🏻
Btw. congratulations on the 3.000 posts - to many, many more 🎊🎉🎈
