Thomas_3
7333
If someone wears a $750,000
watch ANYWHERE they assume all responsibility for it, in my opinion.
Hopefully it was insured.
What do you think of this article in Hodinkee?
That is: whose responsibility (or fault if you will) is it when your expensive private property is violently appropriated from your person? https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/richard-mille-owner-files-legal-action-against-liberty-media-and-cota-after-dolla...
If someone wears a $750,000
watch ANYWHERE they assume all responsibility for it, in my opinion. Hopefully it was insured.
I think wearing a very recognizable and expensive watch is outright stupid in some places…
Nobody deserves to be robbed but ppl need to exercise common sense. I don’t wear nice pieces when I visit my factory in Mexico… lol
In some places.
The calculation then becomes "which places"? And even at a high security affair eventually you leave the bubble.
Nice bonus headlines for RM. Why didn't RM warn their clients, surely they knew. imho this must be answered as part of the liability in this court case.
RM hospitality suite mlght be a trap, and RM surely may be aware of this. Am sure RM can easily make him another one, maybe that's the best outcome.
The conundrum of RM warning its invitees not to wear their RMs to their hospitality suite.
The problem is that even if you beef up security around the suite, the guests can easily be spotted and followed after they’re away from the secure area. Hublot had a solution for this when they sponsored the World Cup in Brazil: plastic Hublot loaner wat...
They could do a RM x Btomic version for the loaners.
Reposted photo courtesy of (stolen from) Larrykelly11 ...
