FanFrancisco
7501
thanks very much for clarification...
sorry for my earlier response which was purely based on laymen understanding. in fact i don't know much about diving and even can't swim. appreciate your clarification.
stefan
It was ten years ago.
By: chronomtr : November 28th, 2009-08:12
In my experience, when I wore my Panerai in 1999, I could hear someone saying it as a clock. But for me, how abou the B-uhr, it is definitely a watch worn by the pilot but they may be all a kind of tool watches in sense. IMO, the market will drive, less n...
I fully agree and ...
By: mac_omega : November 28th, 2009-08:16
I fully agree and I think fashion will come back to more wearable sizes. A size around 36 - 38 mm is not too small and is comfortable to wear. Look at the first PP Calatrava Ref. 96 which was slightly larger than 30mm - it is still an "evergreen" and a mu...
i think...
By: FanFrancisco : November 29th, 2009-05:47
hi Stephen, everyone has his own right to say/comment thing, just like all of us responding to my post here. but i do feel that his statement is slightly biased towards of his company simply because they very focus in making dress instead of functional wa...
do not agree fully
By: Cookies : November 29th, 2009-07:38
dive watches need not be too big because there is a tendency for water to magnify objects way past their sizes. One of the reasons why most dive watches are not suitable is also due to internal reflection that disallows reading time at slanted angles. It ...
+1
By: Quan : November 28th, 2009-20:38
sport/tools watch should look rugged dressy watch need to be able to hide under the sleeve and don't you think we should hat off for a below 40mm complicated watch to show "fine watchmanship" Have a good week ahead