JOHNACONNOLLY
10
vulcain cricket nautical
HI Ztirual,having bought my nautical in 1963 and still have it, the original winding crown has a raised V on it, the cross hatch is correct also on the other crown. Also for information there was a change in this model in its life time.In the early seventies I had a full service done on the movement at the UK agents Marvin watches who mentioned there was a mark 1 and 2 movement in these watches.They would not guarantee the watch waterproof as parts were in short supply even then . Regards John. New member.
Vulcain's vintage 1961 Cricket-nautical
This is a watch that is closely related to the 1st gen. JLC Polaris as those two watches shared the same case and 16 holes perforated back. Interesting the Cricket Nautilcal followed JLC's 1 st diver alarm but preceded the Polaris.The Polaris is a rare wa...
Do you have any more photos?
That is one of the watches I've been chasing for a long time. I've only handled one, and that was a wreck. No idea of the production runs, but there cannot be many out there. The alarm and decompression dial make them a pretty specific and narrow-purposed...
Thanks for your input
I prefer not posting more pictures at this stage, because as stated, they are not mine. I will do so when the watch will be in my hands. Thanks for your input re. the crown, you might well be right. I'll check that if I can. I agree with you that there ca...
The crown...
I've never seen an *original* twin (or triple) crown Super Compressor that didn't have matching crowns - same style, same diameter...usually cross hatched. :-)
Hello BDLJ
I am not sure I understand what you mean. If you have a definitive reference of a full original Cricket Nautical that shows those details, that you mention, please to post it here. I do not really know how relevant it is to compare the Cricket Nautical wi...
The Vulcain...
...in question uses a Super Compressor case. In the image above, the winding crown - while signed - appears to be a replacement. It seems the wrong shape and diameter to be a compressor crown.
Is it? The scans from MattS....
The scans from MattS and the 2 I've handled all have the usual, slightly domed, cross-hatched Compressor crowns.
Have a look at the '61 model. The 2 crowns are not similar in size.
And I think that the ctown at 3 is not hatched... Not sure, though. But the size is clearly different. Which is not the same case with the '66 model ( a detail I ignored ). Best, Nicolas
Thanks Nicolas, you are right
Very dangerous jumping on guns on the base of one or 2 photos and generalizing by saying such type of watch 'always' or 'never' had so and so... I have never seen anywhere a mark I (straight lugs) and mark II (facetted lugs) Vulcain Cricket Nautical with ...
I saw another one, almost all correct ( no plexy and then hands were not good ).
It had the same crown you described. I was interested in it, I made sme researches to see if I could find the plexy and hands, and the time I took in the search was fatal, as the watch was ... sold. :( It was 3 or 4 years ago. Still on the hunt ( but some...
Best of luck my friend
No you are not the only one, I fear. It is also close to be mission impossible to find one of those mark I or II, not to mention one with all original parts, especially crowns, hands, non polished case and intact lumes... I am very happy with mine. The cr...
Well, I have an alternative...
Or I go for the long list: 60 watches. Or I go for the short list: 40 watches. Damn! ;) Best, Nicolas.
The '61 just looks like it...
..has been photographed with the crown pulled out. The diameter and shape and cross-hatch is the same . The example from ztirual has a larger diameter, non-cross hatched crown, with no slight dome. Completely different to the one on the '61 photo. So now ...
vulcain cricket nautical
HI Ztirual,having bought my nautical in 1963 and still have it, the original winding crown has a raised V on it, the cross hatch is correct also on the other crown. Also for information there was a change in this model in its life the early seventies I h...
Dear John,
First of all welcome to this forum. I hope you will also find it a nice, hospitable and informative space. Many thanks for your post and sorry for not having spotted it ealier. What you write is very interesting and infirms an other opinion voiced earlier...
Vulcain Cricket Nautical.
Hi, Z.on enlarging your watch photo I noticed the pusher for the alarm seems to go through a sleeve on the watch ? My vulcain has no sleeve on watch body for the pusher which has a plain top ie no hatch pattern.I bought mine were also billed as being quo...
Sleeve in the watch = recessed?
Dear John, thanks again. i really look forward to your pictures. i am unable to respond to your post for the reason stated in my last reply. i will contact you when I am back via PM (private mail) Best. Z'
I have information from the Vulcain 150th anniv book in pdf
If one of the mods can explain how to insert a pdf I will do it for the general public. Zitrual, if you pm me with an email address - use spaces or it won't come through, I can send it to you directly with some other comments. Ginger
Very interesting watch Z....
....and one I no nothing about, but you have got me very interested in your one!! I'd love to learn what you have learnt from new member John (welcome!) and Ginger, and of course see more pictures of yours. Lack of spares and replacement parts seems to be...
Truly intersting...
..thanks for the post, Z. I own a new version of the Cricket Nautical (a few years old) and i think it is a great dive watch, as it has a look close to the original plus the plexi. I have never seen an original Nautical though and hope we get to see more ...