this_hobby_of_hours
3597
Yes true dat 💯
Language is supposed to add clarity but uniformity of understanding is key.
Age old problem.
🤝
☺️🫶🏼
By: this_hobby_of_hours : May 25th, 2025-09:39
I hear you believe me I hear you. So what I do is just not use the term tri-compax. Even if technically correct, it may serve to confuse and that’s never our intention. For bi-compax, I use it only to indicate there are two sub-dials. Usually for chronogr...
100%!
By: armen.y : May 25th, 2025-17:53
A great attitude about the ever-changing "drift" of terms and how we use them. The only caveat I would add is to beware when a term's new meaning becomes harmful to knowledge, or to those efforts most meaningful to our communities. Thankfully, that is sel...
Hello Abel 👏
By: this_hobby_of_hours : May 28th, 2025-17:40
Yes, exactly as I said in my original post. It has to do with complications and not with subdials. First started by UG. For Bi-Compax, would it be fair to say that it now means any standard chronograph with 2 subdials? Or technically, even that is not cor...