And a strangely good value, so to speak. When you look at other independents etc etc. I love these watches. I get that they are somewhat controversial, because of the explosion of finishes on the movement, but already the movement here is less 'crazy' looking and more and more fantastic looking to me, as time goes forward and the movement becomes more familiar. I liked it on first sight, actually, but wondered if it was too much. It made me ask questions. Is this right? Is this wrong? But that's what Monsieur Biver is all about. I think this movement will age well, very well. One has to see it in many different lighting situations. It's extraordinary. It is not 'crazy'. There is a method to the madness. And it's funny, because I just noted on another post that I was not sure if the Parmigiani chronograph movement was too over the top. Go figure. As for the dial side, I love it for all its classicism and fine detail. My fave, weirdly for me, is the YG on YG with anthracite markers and hands. I dabbled heavily with acquisition. Ultimately, I could not yet commit. I love it. Well done, sir!!