I was considering getting a 5159J. That was before I saw this picture. Retrograde date vs retrograde months plus a chronograph. This one is just an infinitely better looking and a more interesting watch to my eyes. Yes the 5159J has a better crown, a hing...
is a solid company, but I think the hype of it makes it almost impossible to get vs vacheron, frank muller, bulgari, girrard peregax which make excellent and beautiful watches
The FM is a great looking watch. I forget the back view??? do you have it? I'm always curious as to the base caliber FM used on some of his older pieces. Until I know the caliber used on the FM, I wouldn't pass judgement ;-) Cheers, Tim
I still can’t convince myself buying one… because of the movement. Having a chronograph perpetual is kind of a dream, looking like this FM it certainly is a dream. I love about everything about it. Until you know you’re paying quite a lot… for a simple va...
But at least the rotor is in Platinum vs Gold. I agree the movement finishing kills this watch a bit. But its also much less expensive than the Patek. Best to have it with a solid caseback.
I also tend to FM as the winner of this match. It’s really beautiful! And in addition to that the readability of the 5159 was not convincing when I had the chance to wear it for a few days. But looking at the movement of the FM reverses my decision 180 de...
synoymous with impeccable quality especially on these references. FM was trendy and fun (crazy hours) 10+ years ago but movements were always sub par. Case back was solid to then reveal a 70 Swiss Francs or so ETA inside. This is a no no so even at half t...
This is not the case back of the Franck Muller Perpetual Calendar Retrograde Moonphase Chronograph reference 7000 QPE that is in the picture above. Here is the case back of the platinum version. The case back in the replies is form a FM chronograph that i...