ChetBaker
1082
Both nice watches. I owned the LF but sold it after a year. I appreciated the fantastic case, beautiful hands and great movement finishing.
But after a while I realized I preferred a darker dial and an automatic natural escapement movement so had to move it. On the MG: I never tried one on the wrist but it looks fabulous, except for one thing: why oh why did they feel the need to use a movement spacer on a watch in this price bracket? That alone would put me off.
Laurent Ferrier Classic Origin (white/opaline dial) vs Moritz Grossmann TEFNUT (in steel)
I'm planning to add another piece to my collection, specifically a manual wind, and have narrowed it down to the following two choices: - Laurent Ferrier Classic Origin (white/opaline dial) - Moritz Grossmann TEFNUT (in steel) I'd appreciate your thoughts...
So close
LF is more modern, MG more classic, but very similar vibe from both. MG might be more durable choice, but close!
Ah, got ya
I generally like minimalism when executed well, and I think that LF have done a good job. One thing that definitely differentiates them, as you pointed out, is that LF has a more "sporty" look to it, while MG more traditional
I prefer the hand-finishing of the LF
and the rest are aesthetics. Good luck with your choice šš»
Important point
Please elaborate if you don't mind? This is certainly something that I always wonder about when it comes to independents...Many thanks in advance
Long story short, but I chronicled it in the independent section.
I owned an LF origin. Had issues with it, sent it in, waited a long time, finally got it back, and then after a couple of months, the whole crown and stem came apart. Sent it back in and at that point I had it. Iām really leery about independence these da...
Wow, thanks for the heads up!
This sounds like a very bad QC to begin with, followed up a tardy resolution of the issue. I tried finding your original post about it, but without luck. Can you please share the link? Cheers.
Thanks very much for sharing
This kind of stuff is enough to put me off from the brand. The crown construction is just bizarre with a hollowed out piece and a cap on top!? Why! What was the resolution in the end. What did LF say to you?
Oh dear, if I were to use such little things (imho) as exclusion criteria, I probably wouldn't own any watches anymore.
You can find similar stories about pretty much every brand. Don't you think?
It's true...
...but I expect more from independents like LF when it comes to QC & customer service because A) they only make a small amount watches per year so there is really no excuse for bad QC, and B) their customer service needs to be a level above established br...
Both nice watches. I owned the LF but sold it after a year. I appreciated the fantastic case, beautiful hands and great movement finishing.
But after a while I realized I preferred a darker dial and an automatic natural escapement movement so had to move it. On the MG: I never tried one on the wrist but it looks fabulous, except for one thing: why oh why did they feel the need to use a moveme...
Great shout regarding the movement spacer on MG!
I didn't even notice it at first, but clearly the movement isn't properly sized for the case
Hamatic
I love the hamatic, but itās way larger than the Tefnut (thicker too). This Tefnut is gorgeous and slim. I have tried it several timesā¦and bought a hamatic š, but thatās because I already had an MG manual wind.
I am wondering if can you try them on? Usually that will be the deciding factor
I do own the LF (in fact I have serial number 18 which was the movement used in press photos like you show!) I have had it five years now. I still think it might be the most beautiful watch I own in terms of the purity of the dial. The red accents and cro...
Probably trying it on this Friday
My AD has one in stock, albeit the blue colour variant, but at least it'll give me a sense of how it fits on the wrist. Btw, I assume that you've never experienced any QC issues that some members like Tony have reported?
Yes please try the blue one to see if you like the 'feel'.
Mine has been solid in terms of not needing service, but as with anything, your mileage may vary. Unfortunately I feel you can turn up service horror stories for all brands if you look
I guess so...
Perhaps my expectation for independents is (unreasonably?) much higher because I feel like in order to survive they really need to strive for perfection and amazing customer service in order to differentiate themselves from existing big brands...
Love the shape of the LF case but the MG movement is just killer
That's the reason why I chose the LF with Micro Rotor
Is it true that LF doesnāt do their own movements?
I am watching Tim Mosso right now and thatās what I heard him say? That LF movements are made by La Fabrique du Temps (LVMH)? I always thought they were in house. That would be another check in the column for MG for me if thatās true!
What LF does is what the Swiss have always done. Everyone does what they do best.
The movement was developed entirely by LF and manufactured in cooperation with Fabrique du Temps. The finishing is done by hand at LF. It's not desirable to do everything in-house. Even though the major manufacturers can now do it. They have acquired spec...
Interesting!
Thanks for the additional info! My understanding is that MG does a large majority in house, possibly everything but the case and hairspring. There are probably a few other outsourced components too that Iām missing, but they definitely do more than just f...
In general you're right
Production is largely in-house. However, the movement is based on a Unitas gear train
LFdT is responsible for the Ferrier movements
But LFdT is incredible. These movements are not inferior to MG in any way. Choose based on style and features that appeal to you most. Best, Tim