WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

But still a leopard!

 

Someone on IG commented that the waiting list is 5 years, but that may not be accurate. It was 3 years as of last summer, so it may not be inaccurate, either.
The RWS is extraordinary and even for a watch to be mentioned in the same breath is an honor. Certainly the CF is a cousin, with the English style and Daniels heritage. Both have that no compromise quality that is hard to find.
I'm still interested in how Roger would compare/contrast the two Daniels escapements, but he wasn't keen when I wrote him about it.
Nicolas Manouos of the HSNY did, however, and said:
"...As with all escapements, there are advantages and drawbacks. The advantage of the double-wheel escapement is that it provides two direct impulses to the balance in opposite directions. This means it is a self-starting escapement, unlike the detent. The drawback is that it is more complicated to build, as it requires two complete gear trains to fit into the movement, turning the escape wheels in opposite directions.
The co-axial only needs one standard gear train, however one of its impulses is indirect, given through the pallet fork. This means that one impulse may have a slightly smaller amount of energy compared to the other. For all practical purposes this is negligible, and the advantage of not needing to manufacture and fit an entire extra gear train into the watch outweighs it."
Cool!

  login to reply