the only one Streamliner is the original, limited chronograph:
Firstly because of the movement and function.
Second of all because if I compare the dial of the Streamliner Centre Seconds and the Chrono, I feel the dial of the former too empty without the chequered ring and the “60” at 12.
I don’t like the form of the hands of the Centre Seconds.
And it must be a typo: “ the selling price was well above that expected for a three hand watch... “ The Streamliner Chrono was (is) too expensive comparing to an AP Royal Oak, VC Overseas or Patek Nautilus? I don’t think so, especially if we compare the Agenhorn movement of the Streamliner with the standard movements of the above mentioned watches.. And since when is the Streamliner a simple three hand watch?
Personally, I would choose the Streamliner Chrono in a heartbeat over a Patek Nautilis 5711..
Many thanks for the excellent review, the height of the watch must be really an important issue!
Yours,
Adam