WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

Hi Greg, pictures hope to - but unfortunately not now

 

My version retains the large seconds hand going under the case, while introducing the moon. Rejected, by me, was a proposal of counter-balancing a large seconds hand sub-dial with a circular month on the other side.

The motion of the seconds hand I found necessary because it is directly related to the movement beneath and how it operates with its 1/3 side-step dance.

We know Paul. If he finds some extra space, then he wll want to fil it!

Aesthetically for me, that would mean turning the ripples on a lake or a sea on the dial into those on an artificial pond for a decorative purpose such as on a building project or a park in the city. Too claustrophobic!

As it is, I find it wonderously beautiful and the escapement convinces me (I have read the patent application) that it is a friendly challenge to the Daniels/Omega co-axial.

Best to you!
Amery
This message has been edited by amerix on 2010-11-25 11:53:46 This message has been edited by amerix on 2010-11-25 11:56:18

  login to reply