WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

Hmmm..

 

I know US makers were nickel-plating bridges as early as the mid 1860s, or right about the beginning of their rise to power, but those were sold alongside gilt movements for most of the 19th C.  From watches I've seen, not having done any real research on the topic, it seems that with the end of the dominance of 18-size full-plate movements in the US market, came the end of gilt movements.  I've never seen an American-made bridge or 1/2 plate movement(discounting early Howard) that wasn't nickel plated. 

The bridge style movement is usually thought of as being European in origin, with the American makers catching on at the very end of the 19th C as they became fashionable, so it's quite possible that the design came "fully baked" with stripes and plating. 

As a data-point only, I've never seen a European movement that was full-plate and nickel-plated unless it was a Swiss fake

A

  login to reply