I spent an hour or so at the M.A.D. Gallery a few weeks ago. The primary purpose was to really get some time with the LM’s as for the most part my MB&F interest over the years has been directed towards the HMs. And then meeting M2 a few weeks prior an...
The non Evo perpetual is my favorite, here. That said, I'm impressed by these watches, but not attracted to them because they're just not my style. I admire, but from a distance. Best, Emmanuel
I think the non EVO Perpetual is also a slightly better fit on my wrist, and that dial colour is attractive. Certainly we can admire and appreciate even if something may be outside of our personal tastes. I lean sporty or more casual in many of my choices...
To me, the attraction for both is having something non traditional and a little bit unusual on the wrist. They are both creatives, in a sea of plain and ordinary (from a design perspective). To that point MB&F is obviously much further out there in most o...
Horological machines have ushered in a new style in which form and function coexist and diverge. Legacy machines are a testament to the brand's capabilities, featuring jaw-dropping finishes and more classical shapes.
The legibility of the time, a somewhat important factor in any watch (LOL) is greatly improved I think. I think the non EVO Perpetual fits my wrist just a little better. Some case dimensions are different, I could see it immediately with my eye, and the l...
I really like the LM line a lot . Like you said much more wearable on a daily level but when i am in the market for a MB&F i think i will opt for a HM first 🙏🏻