tend to be more understated with their finishing which is also part of their character. The Swiss style of finishing definitely appears more attractive but I am led to believe that no less work goes into a British (or some may argue an English) finished movement. I would definitely prefer a watch with a diameter of 40.2mm and a height of 12.5mm than a watch with a diameter of 42.2mm with a height of 10.5mm. This is mainly because my wrist is small and I purposely visited Charles Frodsham wearing a 34.6mm Patek to see if the difference in size upsetted me. The truth is that the watch felt it was possible 5 or 6mm larger in size and not 7.6mm larger due to the small curved lugs. I am sure many with my wrist size would not complain wearing this Frodsham and would affirm that the watch suits their wrist perfectly. I feel a Voutilainen Vingt 8 has a simpler movement which is great for future maintenance. It is a more refined watch in my opinion that the Charles Frodsham which is of course more exclusive than the Vingt 8. If I had to rank the watches that I had mentioned (and this is purely my own personal preference) taking into account case, movement, dial, size, price, exclusitivity and future maintenance, my rankings would be as follows: 1. Chronometre Contemporain by Rexhep Rexhepi 2. Vingt 8 by Voutilainen 3. Eichi II by Credor 4. Remontoire by Gronefeld 5. Charles Frodsham 6. Insight Micro Rotor by Romain Gauthier.