damianp
2051
Tourbillon and sports watch still doesn't make any sense to me. But then, I'm not a fan of tourbillons anyway. [nt]
No message body
I second that...
...only because I can't afford the tourbillon. I think the case shape and dial color of the original is fantastic. But I prefer it on the strap.
Yeah. Only 12 have been made of the first grand sport tourbillon, of which 4 seem to currently be listed on the website we all know.
I wonder why the're now releasing another series with so few changes. I don't think the bracelet will suddenly make it a seller.
Can somebody please forward this to ALS?
I KNEW it wasn‘t impossible to integrate a watch with a bracelet 😄 I still prefer the look on a strap, this one comes too close to a Nautilus imho. Cheers, Daniel
I kinda expected this to come
LF’s answer to the Nautilus shortage issue. Mixed feelings, mixed feelings. But I must say I have a soft spot for LF
Amazing looking watch
Wish it had a date function though (please don't shoot) Also no tourbillon....
An interesting proposition -- a 170k+ tourbillon is a very high-level choice for a sports watch, but given the limited production I don't think they are taking any chances here anyway.
And I think it does reflect well on LF that they didn't go down the usual beaten path of a steel, entry-level piece to compete with the Nautilus/Royal Oak. Cheers.
i love this...i think it is better looking than on a strap imho...
the metal bracelet looks really nice and well made, of course it is LF ! Best, mahesh.,
I was already a Nautilus fan,
so looks pretty good to me. But no interest in a tourbillon in my sport watch. Could have been an exciting introduction.
Wonderful piece!
I hope they will make a variant without Tourbillon one day. This complication is most of the time “senseless” = without added value (unless you wear a pocket watch). And IMO in a sports watch it is just misplaced. And makes this beautiful watch less reach...