WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Jaeger-LeCoultre

i said i would respond...

 

First, i will say that my view concerns just the Patek and JLC. I have never had the Lange. Journe or Parmigiani on my wrist or even seen in the flesh. So......5110 vs UTT?


The size of the two watches makes a difference to me. The Patek is much closer to my ideal size given my specific wrist. I also think that its size is a big compliment to its style. It is an elegant watch.....one with panache. The 37mm size suits this style. The UTT is, as you say, much more of a tool watch and so can cope more easily I think with the 42.5mm. However, the size and depth of the UTT makes it a much less comfortable wear for me, and on this score I prefer the 5110.

I think it is wrong to compare the two on aesthetics simply because it is comparing apples with pears. The Patek is panache....the UTT is more tool. I vote for 5110 on the panache rating, but the UTT on the tool rating! Having said that, i do think the dial on the 5110 in all of the metals can be breathtaking...a certain wow factor that I don't feel myself on the UTT. The 5110 just has something unusual and special.

In terms of complication, and again this is a personal issue, but the world time complication is more useful to me. I prefer, when travelling, to see in one shot, the respective time zones. I don't want to have to work it out by looking at the case back. So, again, for me...a personal view.....I prefer the 5110. 

Which would i rather have IF I NEVER OWNED EITHER? This is an interesting question. I think I would be swayed to say the 5110. Would i trade a 5110 for a UTT? No. Would i add a UTT? Yes. 

To my mind, i have answered my question on which I prefer.... the 5110. Do i still like the UTT a great deal and would i consider adding it? Yes. 

  login to reply
💰552 Marketplace Listings for Jaeger LeCoultreJaeger LeCoultre Duometre · 1 for sale · 3137 discussions