WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Jaeger-LeCoultre

Let me examine your concerns one by one.

 

(-) It's not a perpetual or even a annual calendar so the complication is not that exciting or ground breaking.
As amanico pointed out, the perpetual is available just in different case sizes. The Master Ultra Thin Perpetual is slimmer (http://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/US/en/watches/master-ultra-thin-perpetual/1302520#/t1) and the Master Eight Days Perpetual (http://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/US/en/watches/master-eight-days-perpetual-40/1612420#/t1) is very slightly larger.

(-) The movement in the display back is not that well decorate and looks boring
The MUT Perpetual isn't any different in that regard. The Master Eight Days Perpetual, however, has a more interesting hand-winding, 8-days movement ... if you like the dial first, that is.

Photo credit: www.jaeger-lecoultre.com m

(-) JLC generally poor resale value, a concern if I need to sell the watch in future
Okay. That seems like a universal truth across the board for this brand.

(-) A bit of a duplicate with my Patek 5205
Uhhh.... I'm not entirely family with Patek numbers but I think the Master Calendar looks more like 5936 than 5205? I'm looking mainly at the dial of course.

I personally like the Master Ultra Thin Moon suggested by JML. Its eggshell dial is very desirable as Spellbound noted. But wrist presence may be more subdued than your original choice. The Eight Days I bring up may have the movement that pleases you more but then its dial is quite busy.

Dilemma, dilemma, so good luck.

Ruckdee

  login to reply
💰552 Marketplace Listings for Jaeger LeCoultre