amanico[JLC Moderator]
400636
While seeing all the iterations which came after, I never regretted my choice.
I just regretted that they came... As I think that the first MMRs would have got a bigger strenght without these " variations ".
That is what JLC should hear, I think.
Best, and thanks for your input, Phil.
Nicolas. This message has been edited by amanico on 2013-10-07 08:30:20
You mean this one?
By: amanico : October 5th, 2013-23:16
As for the sound, I found mine a bit too agreesive. I gave it back to the Manufacture when I was there, and they set the sound in another way: They reduced the volume, to gain in richness. Now, it is much better. Best, Jester. Nicolas. ...
Wow .... a perpetual beauty..
By: W72 : October 7th, 2013-04:36
it will always a beauty the Ti MM. Looking at all your pictures I can imagine the love you have for this piece. BTW the photo with the acoustic parameters - how do you interpret them? I suppose the Volume (dBA) would be as big (loud) as possible? what abo...
Thank you very much.
By: W72 : October 8th, 2013-00:45
It was interesting to note the various parameters but somehow difficult to understand what it means in real sound. I have a reading as follow, with the trebuchet & crystal gong - not sure how much this contributes to making a different sound profile: ...