ei8htohms
8555
agreed, not sure how this could be patentable
It seems pretty clear from the description and what little we can see from the picture that this is a half-flying or semi-flying tourbillon (I can't remember the exact distinction between the two at the moment), so I'm not sure how different it could be that it could be patented. What separates this one from the original Helwig designs for example, not to mention the Klings and Lederer designs of recent years (the BLU half-flying tourbillon only came out last year I believe)? I look forward to learning more of course.
_john
Hi Suitbert!
By: mkt33 : January 19th, 2010-16:51
I don't have the schematics but I will ask. I'll apologize in advance because I know MB is busy at SIHH so it may be a bit until they get back to me. It is interesting because I read about this version of the tourbillon a few years ago but mentally I coul...
This cannot work..........
By: MTF : January 21st, 2010-20:46
.....in my mind! Going back to basic Chronometry 101, like it says in the press release: the raison d'etre for a tourbillon was to fix the centre of rotation of both balance wheel and spiral relative to forces of gravity. OK...we just about managed to gra...