pingtsai[PuristSPro Moderator]
2063
Absolutely not...
....for women only. I would think PAMs are in large part more for men. This one just happens to be one that a woman can wear comfortably
Thanks for your comments.
Big watches on small women.
By: pingtsai : March 1st, 2011-14:54
Hi George! Thanks for reading and your comments. To be honest, the PAM337 would be just perfect (for a small woman) if it was 40mm. It wears smaller since it's thinner and is a Radiomir. The extra 2mm weren't a big deal and it worked and was comfortable b...
Dear Ping!
By: peregrino : March 1st, 2011-05:38
Thank You very much for this fantastic review! Very informative and beautiful photographs too. I am still waiting for my AD to call me about the titanium version (PAM 338) that I have ordered. Best regards Rob.
Great Review. thank you
By: Tony A.H : March 1st, 2011-05:48
looks Great on your Wrist. and if i were you ? i wouldn't go Smaller than that. as you mentioned it, the Extra 2mm is not an Issue comparing it with the 159.(BTW. the 159 was my VERY 1ST Panerai :0))). the fact is that i found Radiomir Watches wear smalle...
Superb write up, Ping.
By: amanico : March 1st, 2011-08:04
And you also included some fresh pics of the Pam 21! Anthony is too lazy to share with us this mythical watch. Back to the 337, it is, I mean the 42 mm case, the 47 mm Rad for Ladies. Big for a lady, but how pleasant once on the wrist! A lovely and clever...
AT is a lazy butt...lol
By: pingtsai : March 1st, 2011-15:08
...and "stinky butt" too as my youngest daughter likes to say. lol But unfortunately, I do have to rely on his photographic skills which I am grateful for (less work for me). There is so much he is working on that I don't know how he keeps his head straig...
Looks perfect!
By: ocwatching : March 1st, 2011-08:06
And you are so right about the "attitude" in wearing a PAM. I am sure the hubby must be thrilled for you to (hopefully) match his PAM 21! Great review and I will be forwarding this to the wife to read. She never really warmed up to my 190 as she thinks it...
Awesome!
By: dxboon : March 1st, 2011-08:47
Well, Ping, what can I say? This is just the latest in the ever-expanding and beautifully-written catalog of reviews from you, that makes me wish for more, more, more! I am really attracted to the entire range of recent Panerai 42mm Radiomirs. They are ex...
Thank you Daos!
By: pingtsai : March 1st, 2011-15:39
I always appreciate your comments greatly. The PAM337 was very nice. I think you would like it a lot too. And not too bad on the price with the stainless one. Hope all is well. We need to do Korean BBQ again sometime. I'm craving it. lol Thanks again for ...
Wow, impressive review
By: ED209 : March 1st, 2011-19:26
Another impressive review Ping! I really like reading your posts, it provides a very in-depth and well thought out review of the PAM 337. I thinks this watch is very versatile and can be either a woman's casual watch or a man's dress watch. If you had a c...
Thanks Ed and I agree.
By: pingtsai : March 2nd, 2011-15:48
It is a versatile watch. It really is still more of a man's watch suitable for a woman to wear. Now adding diamonds would add a whole other dimension. I remember years ago Panerai did have some diamond encrusted LE models. i haven't seen any in a while th...
They are all nice....
By: pingtsai : March 2nd, 2011-19:31
...and it depends on the look that one's going for. The stainless is nice and a little dressier because of the polished case. However, it may be a pain to keep blemish free. The pink gold is a more conservative to me. The titanium is probably the most des...
A full blooded Panerai
By: patrick_y : March 2nd, 2011-15:16
Thank you for the review of the 337. I especially enjoyed the contrast to the larger 47MM PAM 021. It's ironic that although they are so many sizes apart, there is still so much in common between the two. This is truly a watch that can be worn elegantly a...