Bill
32042
So if we don't disregard the 15x price
How does that figure into the mix. I can understand a 1 or 2x difference we can say the comparison holds. But when we are talking about a 15x or 20x diffrence where is our barometer.
I guess we get back to a timex tell time like a Patek. But here we are talking about two watches that have a "slight" variation in the dial . One is steel the other Platinum.
So what are we saying about "reproduction / re issues" is it OK, desirable or even acceptable.
This is such a challenge look at the Daytona thread in the Rolex forum.
I guess we have all beat that horse to death.
Bill
PS It is almost like trying to keep price out of the conversations - a hard nut to crack with that added dimension
Of course...
By: i_am_Sam : April 13th, 2011-19:29
If we disregard the price, I'd pick the 21... The only downside of the 21 is that the case is platinum.. Steel is much preferred material for Panerai.. But just look at the picture... 21 is so much cleaner (without the L SWISS MADE L) have a vintage look ...
I think it's impossible....
By: sirjo : April 14th, 2011-00:50
to be objective on the issue. The 21 is THE grail for so many people for such a long time, it has come to represent almost ALL that is desirable in a Panerai (bar the Platinum which, IMO, doesn't defile the watch at all, since the colour is white). Other ...
21 for me
By: brett_nyc : April 14th, 2011-07:32
If I was considering a 21, it would probably mean I already owned 1 or more vintage pieces, so that aspect of collecting would be taken care of. 21 is a great piece with the Rolex movement and somehow I really like the welded on wire lugs; feels more pure...
Therein is the rub
By: Bill : April 14th, 2011-22:35
When the dimension of price comes into the mix and one what has a slight appeal but is 15x or 20x the price what happens to our perception of the reality. I will say it again I too love the 21 but I am merely illustrating or should I say adding something ...