Agreed with above and also ....

I know and it is true the "original is original" although the cal is not 861 (nor 321 :0) ) any more but 1861 ......

but is so damn attractive to have transparent case back and enjoy the cal 1863 .....

I'm also torn between the one with solid (approved by NASA) and one with Transparent (not approved by NASA)

so basically there are two options in my opinion if you are after Speedy Pro

Reference

3573.50.00 (cal 1863, transparent case back, sapphire crystal, not approved by NASA)

and reference

3570.50.00 (cal. 1861, solid case back, hesalite crystal, approved by NASA)

basically if you enjoy like I do most of all seeing cal and playing with chrono while looking at it go for first

if you wanna something closest to one that was on Moon as you can go for second

Best regards
Damian

💰365 Marketplace Listings for Omega›

Which Speedy Pro to get?

By: 303 : January 28th, 2008-20:12

Hello Omega Afficionados, There have been so many variations of the iconic Speedy Pro to the point that it gets a bit confusing for an Omega newbie. Which among the Speedy Pro variants that are still in production do you guys prefer and why? This might he...

For me ...

By: Bill Sohne : January 29th, 2008-03:55

I say get the one w/ the Hesalite ...

By: Chris Meisenzahl : January 29th, 2008-05:50

crystal, manual wind, and no display back....

Which Speedy...

By: david.graham : January 29th, 2008-09:14

I agree with Chris and Bill - The NASA standard hesalite crystal, solid case back manually wound and for me, on a black alligator.That said, I own a bomb-proof Mark II which has just returned from Omega re-finished and new glass which looks fantastic and ...

Omega