G99
13685
Here's a pic of my oiginal 1932 marine..a rare piece which
i was proud to own,
its actually far better than it looks in the pics.
the watch is a lovely piece but its size is no longer practical for daily wear. its a real collectors cabinet piece.
i own/owned all the omega museum pieces from 2001-2005, but the prices got so ridiculous i stopped buying them. i kept the cosmic and the petrograd, but am liquidating the others.
the new marine is a nice piece, but as a wearer??
Graham
Marine 1932 Collection Museum
Visited the Omega Boutique in Starhill Gallery and saw this illustrious maritime piece !!! Some pics for the Omega Fans! Does anyone know why limited to 135 pieces ? Marine 1932 Museum (No.7), an elegant Art Deco born during the period of German Bauhaus S...
Very interesting! ...
I am impressed by the performance of the original piece. Did you put it on? Did it fit well on the wrist? The lever looks like it may get in the way. Thanks for posting!
Great photos thanks.... I think the size of the watch is too large for me!
Hi Great photos. I had a chance to see the 1/1 from Omegamania in person at the NYC party. It was stunning but the size for me was too large. If only they made it just slightly smaller.. On that note here are a few photos of a late 1930s Marine Standard. ...
Many thanks, Kong, for taking these photos . . .
. . . of a watch that captivated my interest at Omegamania. Is there anyone besides myself that feels Omega missed the boat by not making this in steel at a more affordable price? I'm not drawn by dive watches as a rule, but I'd make an exception for this...
Here's a pic of my oiginal 1932 marine..a rare piece which
i was proud to own, its actually far better than it looks in the pics. the watch is a lovely piece but its size is no longer practical for daily wear. its a real collectors cabinet piece. i own/owned all the omega museum pieces from 2001-2005, but the pri...