Gloster14
14
Smaller size....
Could not do that anymore. I feel naked. 40mm absolute cut off, probably more like 42mm.
Now that's a watch! . . .
. . . and not for the faint of heart, either . . . I tried one on a few months ago, and the lugs were hanging over my wrist. I also tried on the new 36.2 mm automatic version last week - more appropriate, and just as compelling. Cordially, Art
It fits your wrist really well. Pretty innovative to use the..
B&R strap on it. Thanks Paddy.
its great! i have the 2003 model which is 43mm i think.
i used to think it was a big watch, but in the last 4 years watches have just grown and grown. all of these lovely big watches make a rolex datejust look like a girls toy Graham
(sigh) . . . I just don't get it . . .
. . . everyone seems to want larger watches. I tried on the 39 mm Railmaster a few weeks ago, then the new 36.2 mm version a few days later . . . personally, I would choose the smaller of the two. Curiously, I'm beginning to appreciate Rolexes these days,...
Hi people....
Nice watch... too big for me. I´ve just bought the 42mm chronograph... Fits perfectly. Cheers. ...
Yes the XXL does create some great strap options.
Compliments on a beautiful watch you've got there but frankly I'm not a huge fan of that B&R style as it is protruding from between the lugs but I know what you mean about the oem strap being too skinny. Here are some options I've tried on mine, some of w...