Esharp
1617
Why all caps?
Is it me or does 'OMEGA' seem like the branding folks are trying too hard?
Same with Sedna TM gold and Ceragold TM and Liquidmetal (r) etc. Not that Rolex and Hublot and the likes don't do similar things, although at least they don't call themselves ROLEX or hUbLoT etc.
It all seems somewhat self-defeating. Who is ever going to call it an OMEGA rather than an Omega? Does any consumer care? Is this just a way for a bunch of people in the marketing department to justify their continued existence? Or did a lawyer realise there was a threat to their (R)s and TMs if they didn't write it differently?
Of course if they've been doing this since 1903. But based on a quick look round ze interwebs it seems that the *only* folks to call Omega 'OMEGA' is the company's own website.
Best
E.
Why all caps?
By: Esharp : August 6th, 2017-00:12
Is it me or does 'OMEGA' seem like the branding folks are trying too hard? Same with Sedna TM gold and Ceragold TM and Liquidmetal (r) etc. Not that Rolex and Hublot and the likes don't do similar things, although at least they don't call themselves ROLEX...
Nah... :)
By: Esharp : August 6th, 2017-04:48
I wasn't even aware of the capitalisation of the name till I read your post (which was very good!). That's what made me look at Omega's website - er, OMEGA's website, sorry - and then I had to start looking round the web and it just struck me as a bit cur...
Well,
By: amblin_xi : August 12th, 2017-15:48
I really hates omega now... purchased a DSOTM pitch black not too long ago, the more black version of a black watch (sarcasm, I mean it) ....and now they're pumping out the 'master' 9900 movements like sausages. The 9900 is essentially a mirror duplicate ...
.
By: amblin_xi : August 13th, 2017-02:51
Maybe the upgrade can be performed during routine repairs and services . We've all seen similar things been done during the *ahem* 2500 coax *cough* incident. Omega would swap out the older design for the new updated parts whenever required. Several years...