murcielago_boy
62
The differences between 5204 VS 5951
Right we've got two Split Second Perpetual Calender Chronographs here: The 5204 (and it's Lemania-based predecessor the 5004) and the 5951.
Can someone explain the difference between these two pieces (aside from the obvious about shape and look etc).
The 5951 is almost twice the (already very very substantial) price of the 5204 and from what I heard in the Geneva boutique, they've delivered only 10 pieces since it was first released...
What's the story then as, theoretically at least, they do the same thing - split seconds chrono and perpetual calender display.
Any ideas/information?
Available on the marketplace
New Release
Explore Patek Philippe's 2010 BaselWorld chronograph releases: 5170J, 5950A, 5951P, 5960P, 5980/1A, and 5980R. Live photos and collector insights.
53 replies100228 views
New Release
Explore the Patek Philippe Ref. 5208 triple complication from Baselworld 2011, featuring a minute repeater, monopusher chronograph, and instantaneous perpetual calendar.
34 replies66555 views
New Release
Baselworld 2011: Patek Philippe 5270G perpetual calendar chronograph with in-house caliber. Explore its design, features, and collector reactions.
46 replies52048 views
New Release
Explore the Patek Philippe Ref. 5170J and its groundbreaking Calibre CH 29-535 PS from BaselWorld 2010. A deep dive into Patek's new chronograph era.
89 replies47304 views
New Release
First look at Patek Philippe's Baselworld 2014 new releases: Nautilus 5990/1A, 5960/1A, 5951P, 5940G. Live pictures and initial impressions.
41 replies37349 views
Complications
Explore the Patek Philippe 5204P split-seconds perpetual calendar chronograph. A deep dive into its caliber, complications, and comparison with Lange's Double Split.
44 replies23118 views
The differences between 5204 VS 5951
Right we've got two Split Second Perpetual Calender Chronographs here: The 5204 (and it's Lemania-based predecessor the 5004) and the 5951. Can someone explain the difference between these two pieces (aside from the obvious about shape and look etc). The ...
Sure!
Hi Murcielago boy, Reference 5951 is based on thinner base calibre, requiring a harder work at producing parts, finshing and assembling them. It is also finished to a higher level, somewhat at the top of what Patek Philippe has done in that area. So some ...
Yours ...
even better :-) Congrats, it is an incredible piece. Please feel free to share more pictures, sentimens and thoughts about your beauty. Thanks! Oliver
The differences are in the details (inside) ...
and both are based on two very different movements (as mentioned by Dje before). Ref. 5204, cal. CHR 29-535 PS Q vs Ref. 5951, cal. CHR 27-525 PS Q The latter is smaller and thinner and the approach is different - VERY limited production, because of VERY ...
5204 and 5951 do NOT DO the same thing: one is a sschr pp, the other more a chr pp
A very interesting question here! The 5951 uses the caliber first introduced in the 5959. As said very thin and threfore with HORRIBLE tolerances for the watch makers! But aside that it has got some much more interesting features: - a continiously moving ...
Thanks to both Oliver & Moritz.........
For your fine explanation regarding the differences. :) Regards Tony PS Personally, I always marvel at how collectors have so much in-depth knowledge :)
And the 5951 is
Also a mono pusher chronograph as well, another important difference. Gary