mec
48
3919J or 5119J?
Although I have only occasionally submitted posts on this forum, I visit this site often and greatly appreciate all of your insights.
Here's my dilemma: I currently own a Calatrava 3919J as my dress watch (to complement my Nautilus 5711/1A and, hopefully shortly, a 5167A Aquanaut). Does it make sense to upgrade to a 5119J? As far as I can tell, the only differences between the two models are that the 5119J is 2.5 mm larger in diameter and has a sapphire crystal case back. I believe that the 215 PS movement is the same in both. Although the 3919J does not look inappropriately small on my 7.25 inch wrist, the 5119J would probably look better. I just don't know if the upgrade would be worth the additional expenditure. Like many of those who suffer from a PP addiction, I am plagued by perfectionist tendencies. Please help!!
Collection
Miles_151 · Nov 7, 2023
Explore Miles_151's passion for the Patek Philippe Aquanaut Ref. 5167A-001. Discover why this 'under the radar' sports watch captivates collectors.
32 replies7650 views
Service
CastorKrieg · Aug 18, 2020
Discover CastorKrieg's 10/10 Patek Philippe service experience for his Aquanaut Ref. 5167A at the Paris Salon, featuring immediate on-site repair and exceptional client care.
30 replies5662 views
Review
Baron - Mr Red · Jul 25, 2013
Baron - Mr Red reviews the Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167, arguing its versatility and 'un-Patek' charm make it a superior daily wearer to the Nautilus.
20 replies20898 views
3919J or 5119J?
By: mec : October 22nd, 2008-12:49
Although I have only occasionally submitted posts on this forum, I visit this site often and greatly appreciate all of your insights. Here's my dilemma: I currently own a Calatrava 3919J as my dress watch (to complement my Nautilus 5711/1A and, hopefully ...
