Miles_151
3178
5396r all day long. Just look at it it's stunning.
I've always loved this watch and in Rose it sings loud and clear to me. My eyes and heart say 5396r.
Good luck as both are beautiful just imo one more beautiful than the other.
It's a bit like asking my girlfriend which tie should I wear?
Best.
M.
Both wonderful
By: keks : July 30th, 2017-12:15
I would be very happy with either, but if the intention was to wear it regularly I would get the 5205 simply because the bezel is less scratch prone than he flat 5396 bezel. These flat polished bezels can be acratch magnets. If that is not something you w...
For me, it would be the
By: sham1 : July 30th, 2017-22:22
5396 simply because it seems a lot more wearable as not only is it thinner than the 5205 but it is 38.5mm compared to the 5205's 40.2mm diameter. I am also swayed by the Breguet numerals of the 5205. In terms of clarity, I would prefer the 5396 but I have...
Interesting choice :)
By: Mark in Paris : July 31st, 2017-13:35
You've made a deep work of comparing these too in order to try to choose better what would please you. The models you chose remind me of the 5960R opaline dial I looked at in the past (looks very much like the 5205R you picked). Well, I prefer the 5205 fo...
5205 for me.
By: benlee338 : August 10th, 2017-04:44
Plus points over the 5396 - Much more easy to read the date which is arranged very logically - More interesting looking case, more curvy Minus is the it kind of wears small, but may or may not matter depending on your taste, Bottomline, buy what sings to ...
5205 for me
By: Greenwatch : August 10th, 2017-05:58
Back in 2011, I saw the ad of the 5205g in the magazine where a boy is seated on the desk of the father who was wearing a business suit. That ad won me over Patek and my first Patek was a 5205g. I know that watch can be worn on business suit and will look...